Regarding Acting Upon Weak (Da’if) Hadiths Despite the Existence of Sahih Hadiths in Bukhari and Muslim
Question: Why do many people practice weak (da’if) hadiths when authentic (sahih) hadiths exist in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim? Is this permissible?
Answer: In Islamic jurisprudence, only fabricated (mawdu) hadiths are strictly forbidden. A fabricated hadith refers to content that is not an authentic narration at all; both its chain of transmission (isnad) and text (matn) were later fabricated by people, having no connection to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Such narrations must be rejected. Regarding this, the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) stated that whoever intentionally attributes a lie to him should prepare their seat in Hellfire. Beyond this, weak (da’if) hadiths may be acted upon in many areas of Islamic jurisprudence—since a weak hadith simply means a narration with a weak chain of transmission, but it remains a hadith nevertheless. A weak hadith still represents the sayings, actions, or tacit approvals of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). No one abandons authentic hadiths in favor of weak ones. However, if the Quran, other authentic hadiths, the consensus of the Companions and Successors, and 1,400 years of scholarly and righteous tradition support a weak hadith, then it may be acted upon. An individual cannot invalidate an established Sunnah based solely on a narration they personally view as authentic. There are numerous such matters within Islamic jurisprudence.
Answered by: Allama Mufti Obaidur Rahman Khan Nadwi
Source: Jameul Fatawa, Islamic Fiqh and Fatwa Encyclopedia.
Use the e-mail below to send your questions.
